Share this Abstract

Disabled by author

Rate this Abstract

Login to allow rating

Views

Login to allow views

Options


Abstract Details

Abstract Title

Does resistance training intensity influence functional improvement in older adults?

Abstract Theme

Physical activity and health

Type Presentation

Poster

Abstract Authors

Presenter Ewertton de Souza Bezerra - UFAM/UFSC/FAPEAM (FEFF/CDS) - BR
Lucas Bet da Rosa Orssatto - UFSC (CDS) - BR
Rafael Luíz Sakugawa - UFSC (CDS) - BR
Isabel Heberle - UFSC (CDS) - BR
Guilherme Barcelos - UFSC (CDS) - BR
Antônio Renato Pereira Moro - UFSC (CDS) - BR

Presentation Details

Poster Exhibition Site (Local): Yellow - 26        Date: 2 September        Time: 8am to 7pm        Presenter: Ewertton Bezerra

Abstract Resume

Background: Deficit in elderly muscle strength results in reduction of functional performance in activities of daily living. Therefore, resistance training (RT) is a effective
strategy to change this situation. Training intensity seems to have a great importance attenuating these consequences. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the
intensity-dependence for upper-body functional performance improvement in older adults.

Methods: Eighteen untrained older adults volunteers (9 men and 9 women) were randomized in two groups: HI-High intensity (n=9, 61±6 years; 77±12kg; 1.66±0.1m) and LI-Low Intensity
(n=9, 66±6 years; 77±12kg; 1.65±0.1m). Subjects were tested and retested before the RT period (T1) for baseline values. RT effects were assessed after 12 (T2) and 24 (T3) sessions. On each test days,
a five-repetition maximum (5-RM) for seated row; hand grip strength test (HGS) and local muscular endurance for elbow flexors (LME) were performed. The subjects trained with seated row for 24
sessions, 3 times per week with at least 48 hours of rest between sessions.  Groups trained with different intensities ((p<0,001) and equal volumes (HI- 3 x 5 RM, 83% 1-RM estimate and LI 1 x 15 RM,
66% 1-RM estimate),  where the HI group has a rest interval of 120s between sets. Before each training session, the groups performed a specific warm-up, consisting of 10 repetitions with approximately
50% of the resistance used in the training session. The training resistance was increased by 5–10% for the next session when subjects were able to perform more than repetitions scheduled for the
session. Independent sample T-test was used to verify differences between groups for intensity of 1-RM estimate. All comparisons were analyzed by means of two-way ANOVA analysis of variance for
repeated measures (group x time). Post-hoc was performed using Bonferroni corrected when main effects or interactions were significant (p<0.05).

Results: Baseline values were similar between groups (p>0.05). After 24 sessions of RT the LME significantly increased for LI group (20±0.7) compared with HI group (17±0.7), p=0,023.
In other way, 5-RM (48±4 and 51±4; p=0.57) and HGS (33±3 and 34±3; p=0.91) did not show difference between groups. When compared moment within of the groups, both showed the same results, in LME T3
was different for T1 (p=0.006) and T2 (=0.020), however for 5-RM, T1 was different for T2 and T3 (p<0.001), as well as, T2 was for T3 (p<0.001). The HGS no showed changes during three moment for both
groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The intensity seems to make no difference to improve upper body maximum strength (5-RM) in untrained older adults, because both intensities showed improvement over time.
LME showed better adaptation for LI group because of training specificity (1 x 15). Finally, different intensities do not influence change in HGS.


Comment this abstract (0 comments)